There are a lot of blanket statements made about agile from both sides. Proponents say Â“agile is a silver bullet.Â” Detractors decry agile as complete chaos. Of course, neither of those ends of the spectrum are very accurate. But it can take folks a long time to arrive at that realization. Recovering project manager Andrew Makar writes about this experience on a recent article on the Gantthead website, titled Â“Agile Myths Debunked.Â” In it, he recounts how, several years ago, he and a colleague shared a laugh over a vendor championing Â“extreme programming.Â” Now that agile and its engineering practices have grown up quite a bit more, Makar remarks, Â“IÂ’m not laughing anymore.Â”
In the article, he goes on to list four major misconceptions he had about agileÂ—ThereÂ’s no documentation in agile! ThereÂ’s no planning in agile!, etc.Â—and, one by one, explain how heÂ’s seen those myths debunked through real world experience. IÂ’m not sure any experienced agile practitioner will find much here that will surprise them, but thatÂ’s hardly why itÂ’s a good read. Instead, itÂ’s satisfying to step back and consider how far agile methodologies have advanced. Truly, it wasnÂ’t very long ago that these types of criticisms were leveled at agile and, in an article like MakarÂ’s, theyÂ’re held up as evidence of how far our thinking on the topic has come.
What do you think? Have you seen the acceptance of agile methods and techniques grow in acceptance in recent years? Or do you perceive that folks are still clinging to the Â“mythsÂ” Makar outlines?
Posted under Agile Methodology
This post was written by admin on July 1, 2009